[過去ﾛｸﾞ] スレッドを立てるまでもない質問スレッド Part 371 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

860: 🥹英ちゃん😉 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW ca86-HUrp) [age] 10/12(土)08:03 ID:v5EpK8+l0(4/10) AA×


[240|320|480|600|100%|JPG|べ|ﾚｽ栞|ﾚｽ消]
860: 🥹英ちゃん😉 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW ca86-HUrp) [age] 2024/10/12(土) 08:03:06.02 ID:v5EpK8+l0 "Since the flight was cancelled, John should not have arrived in Tokyo yet." Is this sentence, grammatically correct? What does the phrase "should have not" function as semantically? 回答 Yes, the sentence "Since the flight was cancelled, John should not have arrived in Tokyo yet" is grammatically correct. The phrase "should not have" indicates an expectation about the past, implying that, given the flight cancellation, it is reasonable to conclude that John did not arrive in Tokyo. It reflects a belief that the situation (his arrival) is contrary to what is expected based on the information provided (the flight being cancelled). 日和ってんな、こいつ🤔 http://lavender.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/english/1716304866/860
回答 日和ってんなこいつ

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

あと 142 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.023s