[English] -- 英文法・語法に関する質問 Part 26

[過去ﾛｸﾞ] [English] -- 英文法・語法に関する質問 Part 26 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次 1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割ﾚｽ栞

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索歴削→次ｽﾚ栞削→次ｽﾚ過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

778: The OED Loves Me Not (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5e89-L1I+) [sage] 2023/06/23(金) 10:07:49.74 ID:xfvClUTr0

>>767
私の小さな頭が混乱しそうなので、勝手ながら（しかも蛇足ながら）ここで私なりのメモ書きをしておこう。
今回の課題文には、★印をつけておく。

(1) >>767 が貼り付けてくれたリンク先の tweet 上の画面より
There is a class of persons who think it enough if a person assents undoubtingly to what they think true,
though he has no knowledge whatever of the grounds of the opinion, and could not make a tenable defense of it
against the most superficial objections. ★Such persons, if they can once get their creed taught from authority,
naturally think that no good, and some harm, comes of its being allowed to be questioned.★ Where their influence prevails,
they make it nearly impossible for the received opinion to be rejected wisely and considerately,
though it may still be rejected rashly and ignorantly; for to shut out discussion entirely is seldom possible,
and when it once gets in, beliefs not grounded on conviction are apt to give way before the slightest semblance of an argument.

http://lavender.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/english/1681136038/778

779: The OED Loves Me Not (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5e89-L1I+) [sage] 2023/06/23(金) 10:08:30.27 ID:xfvClUTr0

>>767 に関連する書き込み（その2）

(2) Project Gutenberg 上の同著の該当部分（上の tweet 画面のものと少し違っている）
There is a class of persons (happily not quite so numerous as formerly) who think it enough if a person assents undoubtingly to what they think true,
though he has no knowledge whatever of the grounds of the opinion, and could not make a tenable defence of it against the most superficial objections.
★Such persons, if they can once get their creed taught from authority,
naturally think that no good, and some harm, comes of its being allowed to be questioned. ★
Where their influence prevails, they make it nearly impossible for the received opinion to be rejected wisely and considerately,
though it may still be rejected rashly and ignorantly;
for to shut out discussion entirely is seldom possible,
and when it once gets in, beliefs not grounded on conviction are apt to give way before the slightest semblance of an argument.
Waiving, however, this possibility--assuming that the true opinion abides in the mind, but abides as a prejudice, a belief independent of,
and proof against, argument--this is not the way in which truth ought to be held by a rational being.
This is not knowing the truth. Truth, thus held,
is but one superstition the more, accidentally clinging to the words which enunciate a truth.

http://lavender.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/english/1681136038/779

上下前次 1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

あと 216 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.010s