[過去ﾛｸﾞ] スレッドを立てるまでもない質問スレッド Part 366 (1002ﾚｽ)

スレッドを立てるまでもない質問スレッド Part 366 http://lavender.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/english/1692947292/

上下前次1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

58: 名無しさん＠英語勉強中 (ｱｳｱｳｴｰT Sab2-u+pL) [] 2023/08/26(土) 10:01:20.42 ID:+AEcqSzga >>48 初めまして。 I'd think that if there’s an elided phrase in "but you might not in your case. ", it would be "(you might not) have no problem", assuming that it should be recoverable in context. If so, I'm afraid that the recovered clause "You might NOT have NO problem" might sound strange to you because of double negation. Wouldn’t you find the double negation in the phrase "but you might not" itself, given that "have no problem" could imply almost the same as "be okay", even if you regard the recovered clause "You might NOT have NO problem" as weird? http://lavender.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/english/1692947292/58

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

あと 944 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

Google検索

Wikipedia

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 1.695s*