[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Let's talk with Jim-san (1001ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞
このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ
835(2): IZUMI ◆IZUMI162i6 2006/07/25(火)00:00 ID:md5umibV(1/2) AAS
>>818
Thank you for your res.
I think...
We must not delete each message. If they make a communications.
Our work is to defend communications.
Even if it is negative communications, we should defend.
So, we should delete SPAM.
At the same time, we should defend safety.
Therefore, we need the concept of "Important deletion".
So, we should delete private information and the attacked mail address.
省2
848(1): Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys 2006/07/25(火)14:08 ID:f0kCO8hq(4/9) AAS
◆IRAIaaV18I
◆DQN/9/VVV.
◆uRW6KoTaRo
◆IZUMI162i6
◆sacrifyqG
◆79EROOYuCc
These are the deletion volunteers that I see have posted requesting. We need more I think.
If anyone has a problem with any of these people being deleters, Please post your VALID
reasons on this board.
Thank you Izumi-san for your constructive posts and I am sorry I have not returned your email yet.
省4
859(1): koro ◆8j1enTAicY 2006/07/25(火)20:28 ID:euFOvr8y(5/6) AAS
Dear Jim-san
>>848
>Please only delete spam for now.
Is it processed by the judgments of the individual those who delete it?
>>835 "spam" = "Important deletion"?
When it answers an unanswered question, it is glad.
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.024s