[過去ﾛｸﾞ] 【療養費】 接骨院・整骨院の謎 150【とは？】 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net (973ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

99: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 2ed5-wjSU) 2017/07/01(土)18:48 ID:UQXead440(15/36) AA×
>>91


[240|320|480|600|100%|JPG|べ|ﾚｽ栞|ﾚｽ消]
99: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 2ed5-wjSU) [sage] 2017/07/01(土) 18:48:49.83 ID:UQXead440 >>91 こっちなら答えられるだろ。根拠も書けよ。英語の早口言葉で返すかな？ It is unlikely that the head-injured patient got convinced and assented when he was told that he was suspected of having cerebral hemorrhage and would be consulted to neurosurgeon five days later. Given no reply to the above fundamental question, you seem to have no basis no matter personal or objective. Which is the actual case? (1)You thought of cerebral hemorrhage, but there was no convincing basis that directed you to defer the transfer of the patient to neurosugeon till fifth day. (2)You never thought of cerebral hemorrhage on the very first day, and it is not true that you had the basis. http://egg.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/hosp/1498830169/99
こっちなら答えられるだろ根拠も書けよ英語の早口言葉で返すかな？

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

あと 874 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.026s