[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Let's talk with Jim-san.on HK. (239ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ
178(1): 2009/12/15(火)10:52 ID:SNcqRGedO携(1/3) AAS
Thank you for >>177.
By the way,when you go to the office?
and,what is the skill that only delete you?
have a good day!!
179(1): [age] 2009/12/15(火)13:33 ID:SNcqRGedO携(2/3) AAS
>>178
×:what is the skill that only delete you.
↓
○:do you have the skills to remove only you?
180(1): ΟΔΥΣΣΕΥΣ ◆YE6tMtjT7Q8t ＠Apparently admin ★ 2009/12/15(火)13:46 ID:???0 AAS
>>179
Sure I have the skill rm -rf *
It works every time.
181: 2009/12/15(火)15:09 ID:SNcqRGedO携(3/3) AAS
>>180
Excellent!!
thank you very much!
Please teach if there is necessary insufficient informathion.
182(1): 2009/12/21(月)00:47 ID:KaCtrNvK0(1) AAS
Jim-san.
I saw 2chｽﾚ:housekeeping
as "Don't delete posts in the thread 2chｽﾚ:soap . Jim-san agrees."
Is that true?
If yes, please state in the thread 2chｽﾚ:housekeeping
or 2chｽﾚ:housekeeping
, like 2chｽﾚ:housekeeping .
Now, the thread 2chｽﾚ:soap cannot be post.
And the next thread 2chｽﾚ:soap can be post.
this thread's posts must not be deleted like the previous thread?
183(1): RobinHood ◆enUEIWqQt2 ＠Apparently admin ★ 2009/12/21(月)08:05 ID:???0 AAS
>>182
This is a very confusing post. In English, or in Japanese.
Please say directly what you are asking.
184: 2009/12/29(火)03:31 ID:l6Za3JFM0(1) AAS
>>183 jim-san,Helloooooo
By the way, when does >>174 become?
Please teach the time limit.
185: 2010/02/10(水)09:17 ID:zhbxfsPO0(1) AAS
過去ログ削除に取組んで下さい。jimさん御願いします。
186: 2010/02/25(木)23:56 ID:pRi8a1EP0(1) AAS
Hello Jim-san.
I sent an email to you.
25 Feb 2010 23:54
title 過去ログ削除専用スレッド 2chｽﾚ:housekeeping
よろしくおねがいします。
187: 2010/04/29(木)23:51 ID:3PwLk7b40(1) AAS
jim-san What's up?
Sorry to remind...
>>177
How quickly can this be done...
188: 2010/11/12(金)09:34 ID:PjJfidDA0(1) AAS
Hi，Jim_san.
2chｽﾚ:housekeeping
The thread mentioned above.
This thread is....
Only the person who got approval beforehand can write to this thread.
The person who got approval from Jim_san.
I want to know the name of all members who got approval.
Please teach the name of people taking approval beforehand.
189: 2010/11/14(日)08:41 ID:d4zCZ7TiO携(1) AAS
Jimさん
へるす板の、本番行為助長のレスについては一律削除ですか？
どういった方向で考えられてますか？
待ってる人が沢山います。
申し訳ありませんが、英語が分からないので、日本語でお答え頂けたら助かります。
190: 2010/11/17(水)01:21 ID:uoeQRlX80(1) AAS
JIMさん
お水出会い系の板はレス削除人不在ですか？
かなり削除要請ありますが放置状態です
191: 2010/11/18(木)07:30 ID:Vv05U7nh0(1) AAS
There are considerably many voices to expect the deletion work start of the reply of the contribution to promote the public performance act of the thread of Jim さんへるす (reply deletion), but does think in a direction done how?
192(1): Primavera ◆FLOWERqR32 2011/05/30(月)21:04 ID:eR+p25X40(1/2) AAS
Dear Jim-san,
One problem happened now.
You were sentenced in the interim order from the Tokyo district court on May 9th 2011.
外部ﾘﾝｸ[pdf]:www.alcien.jp
There are a lot of deletion request which are based on the interim order.
2chｽﾚ:housekeeping
I am thinking so,
If there is not refutation 7 days later to the deletion request, you permit deletion.
What do you think?
193(2): jim ◆IamTAAl4HA 2011/05/30(月)21:31 ID:FCadFacm0(1/2) AAS
>>192
This court does not have jurisdiction over the Pink Channel servers.
That would have to be done in Carson City Nevada, or maybe San Francisco California.
I see my name, and many old posts on archive servers.
This person has taken a lot of time and effort to do this. Did they ever
ask for a deletion request on our boards, and if they did it might not have been
justified since it is about an actress who is at least B level.
If it is justifiable for deletion, then we can delete, but that court order is not
194: Primavera ◆FLOWERqR32 2011/05/30(月)22:21 ID:eR+p25X40(2/2) AAS
I knew that the interim order was outside for you.
However, in future, may I report similar order to you?
Thank you.
195: 忍法帖【Lv=1,xxxP】 jim ◆IamTAAl4HA 2011/05/30(月)23:07 ID:FCadFacm0(2/2) AAS
>>193
Yes please do. thank you for reporting this.
196(1): 2011/05/31(火)01:45 ID:ieamHlik0(1/3) AAS
Getting interim order is one of the ways at 2ch for requesting deletion officially.
You had better keep in mind that this might be taken for a proof the
lawyer requested for deletion officially and you did not delete them
within reasonable period of time when they will do official lawsuit at
NV/SF later date. (Not following BBS's official way for requesting
deletion does not matter.)
197(2): jim ◆IamTAAl4HA 2011/05/31(火)09:45 ID:Gk+39F370(1/2) AAS
>>196
I know this might sound offensive, but what happens in Japan does not
matter. This court order actually has no affect, those posts from 2002 and 2003
are valid, and do not need to be deleted.
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
あと 42 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.018s