＊☆★ネトウヨ・メンヘラ隔離スレ★☆＊

＊☆★ネトウヨ・メンヘラ隔離スレ★☆＊ (82ﾚｽ)
上下前次 1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割ﾚｽ栞

70: 名無しさん [sage] 2018/05/27(日) 12:28:05.55 ID:wpmRyjNM0

Unsolicited Communications
Imagine the following situation: John used to be employed by ABC Inc.
His supervisor, Bob, disliked John and treated him poorly.
John eventually left ABC Inc. to find another job. After he left, Bob called all of the local businesses to tell them about how terrible an employee John was.
Does Bob still have the common-interest privilege protecting a former employer’s reference?

No. The privilege only kicks in if the former employer is requested by the prospective employer to give the information.
An employer that takes their own initiative to communicate with a prospective employer,
without having first been requested by the prospective employer to do so, does not receive the protections provided by the privilege.

Courts have also noted that the common-interest privilege may be lost
if the former employer excessively communicates or includes statements that are irrelevant to the matters being discussed.
Employers that want to ensure their statements remain privileged, should restrict their statements to those concerning matters being discussed.

So, in Bob’s case, because he preemptively contacted prospective employers without being requested to do so,
his statements cannot be protected under the privilege protecting a former employer’s reference.

http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/northa/1515626144/70

上下前次 1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.636s*