＊☆★ネトウヨ・メンヘラ隔離スレ★☆＊ (82ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

69(1): 2018/05/27(日)12:27 ID:wpmRyjNM0(1/3) AAS
外部ﾘﾝｸ:www.worklawyers.com

And, if the information was given without being requested by the potential employer,
it is strong evidence that the statement is false or made with the intent to prevent the employee from being hired. If that is the case,
the former employer may have broken the law by volunteering the information.

Malicious Statements
If a statement is made by a former employer with malice, the common-interest privilege protecting the employer’s reference does not arise.
The California Supreme Court has defined malice in this context as a state of mind arising from hatred or ill will, which evidences a willingness to injure another person.

---

76: 2018/08/28(火)20:45 ID:GGsYh5u90(1) AAS
>>69
このケース、ジョンさんは当事者と言えど犯罪だそうですよ

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 2.236s*