[過去ﾛｸﾞ] なぜ悪質な永久機関ビジネスはなくならないのか？４ (763ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

370(4): 2013/08/16(金) NY:AN:NY.AN ID:??? AAS
Journal of Applied Logic
Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2005, Pages 15-41

外部ﾘﾝｸ:www.sciencedirect.com
The most popular of those is the so-called Russell set, R := {x|not x∈x}, for by the law of
excluded middle one immediately gets ‘R∈R∧not R∈R’, an apparent contradiction.

---

371: 2013/08/16(金) NY:AN:NY.AN ID:yZNU8F6H(2/6) AAS
>>370
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF

WWWWWWWWWWWW

---

372(1): 2013/08/16(金) NY:AN:NY.AN ID:yZNU8F6H(3/6) AAS
>>370
paraconsistentは公理的集合論ではない
バカなのか？ん？

---

376: 2013/08/17(土) NY:AN:NY.AN ID:KGz9QE31(2/4) AAS
>>370
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF

WWWWWWWWWWWW

---

383: 2013/08/17(土) NY:AN:NY.AN ID:nZuPwh11(1/3) AAS
>>382
>>370
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF
there is nor any Russell set in ZF

WWWWWWWWWWWW

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.033s