Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 39

[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 39 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次 1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割ﾚｽ栞

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索歴削→次ｽﾚ栞削→次ｽﾚ過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

808: １３２人目の素数さん [] 2019/06/29(土) 07:48:36.95 ID:j3LRAJOP

>>807

”重大で不都合な事実を指摘され”の”事実”だけど、

８月のSS報告書と望月コメントの後、Fesenkoのコメントに、
ttps://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/plp/pmzibf/rapg.pdf
SSはevidence of the ’faults’を示すべきだと書かれては、
SSが示さないと。

Of course, it is still possible to contribute useful　questions/comments/remarks in　relation to more conventional parts of the theory, e.g. those which came in 2012 from Dimitrov and Venkatesh.

To make a mistake in one’s mathematical study is forgivable, especially when one tries to understand a complex theory.
However, publicly talking about ’faults’ in another theory for several years without ever having any valid evidence of the ’faults’ is not what we can support.

SSの8月のレポートは誤りと誤解があると書かれているから、先のevidence of the ’faults’を示して、これにSSは回答があるのかなと思っている。
The second version of their report does not address most of comments of Mochizuki on their first report.
The second version of their report also included new incorrect statements such as a blunder in classical height theory and a fundamental misunderstanding of the famous work of the German mathematician G. Faltings

それと改めて読んで気づいたけど、加藤のIUT本は英訳されのかな。
one can watch F. Kato’s talk and hopefully his bestselling book will soon be translated into English.

http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1559125072/808

上下前次 1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

あと 177 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.008s